Tag Archives: misandry

Fighting Misandry in India

Delhi Police Commissioner: No 498A Arrests W/O Permission Of DCP

The Final Report Of Film Actor Prashanth’s 498A Case (pdf is at the end)

A Guide To Surviving IPC 498A

SC Clarifies Sections 406 And 498A – 2007

AP HC Acknowledges The Abuse Of 498A – 2007  —

Justice Dhingra Clarifies Issues Of Jurisdiction In An NRI 498A Case- Jan 20

SC Explains The Applicability Of Section 498A In A Judgment – 2002

Hyderabad Police: No Arrest In 498A Cases Without Permission Of DCP – 2002

Men Wail on Renuka’s shoulders

E-plaint lands NRI hubby behind bars

Harassed husbands?

Law with flaw

In India Feminist laws have harassed women as well

Police circular in Delhi–watch below

Heights of Male Bashing

I always find it interesting that there are celebrity men out there who will practice misandry with aplomb. Maybe they are trying to get into the good books of women and just like feminists, they know that there is no penalty for male bashing. Have you ever seen a woman practicing misogyny? NO. At most some women will speak out against feminists, but Misogyny against the gender as a whole? NEVER. Men who commit blatant unsubstantiated misandry need to be rebuked.


Who’s Oppressing Who?

Read a very insightful analysis of current day feminism by Barbara Kay

Barbara draws interesting parallels between anti-Semitism and feminism. A scapegoating ideology always ends in grievance-collecting and a conspiracy theory of history. Just like virtually all Arab and many other Muslim nations rely on Jew hatred to externalize an explanation for their own failures, so do feminists rely on men to explain their own failures. It works very well. The world has not seen such a widespread and virulent strain of anti-Semitism dominating an entire region since the Nazi era.

As a result of feminists’ promotion of career equity with men and unrestrained sexual experimentation over early and faithful commitment, women are having fewer children later, and many are having none. Consequently, birthrates are down in all western countries, in many below the replacement levels.

When angry feminists adduce their mantra that only men are inherently violent and that women use violence only in self-defense, I bring up a theme that is forbidden to discussion in women’s shelters: how is it then that partner violence amongst lesbians is significantly higher than amongst heterosexual partnerships?

  • Supreme Court of Canada chief justice Beverley McLachlin: “We have to be pro-active in rearranging the Canadian family”
  • Former justice minister Martin Cauchon: “Men have no rights, only responsibilities”
  • Feminist psychologist Peter Jaffe, a social-context educator of family court judges: “[J]oint custody is an attempt of males to continue dominance over females”
  • And most egregiously this from the National Association of Women and the Law: “Courts may treat parents unequally and deny them basic civil liberties and rights, as long as their motives are good”.

Misandry in family law arises from an ideology that views children as the property of women, even though many peer-reviewed studies show children want and need both parents, and no studies show sole parenting by a mother serves children’s best interests. This ideology is instilled in judges during training sessions featuring feminism-driven materials, and subsequently often plays out as unaccountable kangaroo courts.

Is it then a suprise that paternity fraud is worth nothing? (READ HERE)

There is a Yiddish expression my mother used to invoke with a philosophical sigh, “der reidele dreht sich” – the wheel turns. A hundred years ago, it was homosexual love that dared not speak its name. Today homosexual love roars, and it is manliness that whispers in the shadows.